Skip to main content

Investment summary

ID
Spend
Start
Planned end
Total estimated investment value    
Aid type
Flow type
Collaboration type
Finance type
Status

Locations

The country, countries or regions that benefit from this Investment:

Policy markers
Responsible agency
Implementing partners

Jump to:

UN Sustainable Development Goals

Tier 2 Results – Case studies listed by indicator

Performance ratings

Investments that are rated 3 or less for both effectiveness and efficiency are reported as Investments Requiring Improvement and will require a Remediation Plan to improve performance.

  • 6 = Very good; satisfies criteria in all areas
  • 5 = Good; satisfies criteria in almost all areas
  • 4 = Adequate; on balance, satisfies criteria; does not fail in any major area
  • 3 = Less than adequate; on balance does not satisfy criteria and/or fails in at least one major area
  • 2 = Poor; does not satisfy criteria in major areas
  • 1 = Very poor; does not satisfy criteria in many major areas

Useful links

All figures are in Australian Dollars.
Due to rounding, discrepancies may occur between sums of the component items and totals.
The portal only includes reporting against the SDG goals based on sector data. Policy markers for an investment are separately detailed under Policy Markers.
There will be differences when comparing portal data to OECD reporting. This is as a result of different reporting periods, currency and requirements.